Bitchat allows internet-free end-to-end encrypted P2P communication applications.

"Illustration of Jack Dorsey's Bitchat app enabling offline messaging through a peer-to-peer mesh network, generated by artificial intelligence." (RudeBaquette, “Jack Dorsey’s Offline Messaging Bombshell”: Bitchat Launches Peer-to-Peer App With End-to-End Encryption and Zero Tracking for Total Privacy)

Bitchat is a new tool for chatting and communicating. That application offers end-to-end encryption. P2P communication.The new application for P2P messaging and maybe, quite soon, for other data sharing uses BlueTooth for communication. The BlueTooth has its limits for communication. The range for that communication tool is the main problem, and the system requires mesh technology. That means support stations for long-range communication. The other version is to use an extra power BlueTooth device or some kind of amplifier that can increase the range of the BlueTooth. The system can use a standard radio amplifier that raises the BlueTooth power. 

***************************************************

Standard BlueTooth devices have the following classes and ranges. 

Device Power Class Bluetooth Range

Class-1 100 meters

Class-2 10 meters

Class-3 1 meter

(https://www.rfwireless-world.com/terminology/bluetooth-range-and-coverage)

***************************************************

Or a series of mobile telephones with BlueTooth capacity. BlueTooth is a common system in wireless headphones, mice, and other kinds of wireless tools. BlueTooth allows to share an internet connection and share files between devices outside the Internet. That thing makes it possible that the data can be shared outside the network. That can cause some data security problems. The BlueTooth connection requires that the other participant of the session send the access key to the other participant. And there is a possibility to cheat a person into connecting the device to the wrong system. That means the system’s ID is easy to fake. Or there can be a router in a mesh station that sends all data to the network. 

And if the hacker sends the fake ID to another participant using the stolen ID, that means those people can connect their devices to the hacker's computer. The problem is that the ID that the device uses can be stolen or even created by hackers. But the end-to-end encryption protects privacy against internet-based eavesdropping. This kind of system can be interesting. They can replace internet-based data transportation. But there are also weaknesses. And one of them is this. 

Because there are no phone numbers, no internet, and no servers. That means those systems are hard to hack over the net. But there is a possibility of cheating the users into sending data to hackers’ devices. Or there can be a router in a mesh station that can double the data flow. And that can endanger data security. Because BlueTooth range is so short, the need to use mesh stations can endanger data security. 

https://www.rfwireless-world.com/terminology/bluetooth-range-and-coverage

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/jack-dorseys-offline-messaging-bombshell-bitchat-launches-peer-to-peer-app-with-end-to-end-encryption-and-zero-tracking-for-total-privacy/

Bitchat homepage: 

https://bitchat.free/

Media and artificial intelligence

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Selective handling of data means, that in the tomorrow would be possible to use methods, what allows to filter images, what is prohibited to share from the picture, what shared in the social media. This kind of tools like very fast computers and sophisticated computer programs allow the automatized censorship for faces and other things, what danger the person's privacy.

Those systems can also be used to automatized identification of persons, and it can be used to ask people if they want to share their faces in the social media. But it needs the ability to recognize people and this might cause the leak of the security. If hackers can break the control-level of that kind of system, they can use it for tracking the persons. And another problem with this system is that it can be used with Predator- and other combat UAV, what can communicate with central computers of the Internet, and then find those persons by using the location data, and target the weapons to that target.

The system can use nuclear-powered drones for tracking that person, and when there is enough room around this person, would it open fire with missiles. The Predator is very easy to change ans the drone, what uses electric motor and RTG-generator for giving extremely long operational time,  and altitude. Computers can easily calculate the kill radius of the missiles, and open fire when the target is alone in the beach, and the support team or sensitive artificial intelligent program can call the target to the remote position by playing some drug or dealer or another business partner. The profession of the caller can use to make a profile, is the targeted person real criminal. And if the caller is some drug dealer, who calls the target, would the conclusion be, that the man is a criminal.

Only persons, who have given this permission would be seen in the social media, and others faces would be hidden behind the black box. That kind of image recognition system makes possible that person would not need to take even keys from the table when our main character will walk out. Those image recognition systems can use multiple sensors, like retina-scanners and IR-cameras, what also detect the possibility of plastic surgery. And in the wildest dreams, the system can use 3D-X-ray scanners.

Sniffer scanners can detect the form of the skull, and the chemical analyzers can also be used to detect the person. Those "people sniffer" equipment can be modified gas detectors, and they can work like the artificial nose. This kind of equipment work looks like an artificial dog, and they can carry in the wrist pocket. So they can also be used for tracking people from society. The lasers and another kind of stuff can also detect the DNA of the person by use mass-spectroscopy.

That kind of equipment can be real in the future. But when we are turning back to the people, who are denying to share their identity on the Internet, would that cause some other problems, The system can use that information for select people, who wanted to target the surveillance. One very good way to choose persons for intensive surveillance is that they would not allow sharing anything about them on the Internet. That tells the system, that this person has something to hide. And only interesting targets give something for the security service.

Hiding identity in the network

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Almost every day somebody would want to hide the identity because this person has been done something embarrassing on the  Internet. And somebody would make the thing, that they use those embarrassing web services only from the public places, and use the Google or Microsoft account, what they will not open in the home or workplace. Those persons would think, that nobody knows, who they are.


But those places, where the person uses the Internet, would be targeted by surveillance cameras, and then that allows that security team can look those people straight away when they notice the use of the Internet. They must just point those cameras in that area, where the user is using network services. And if there is only one laptop user at the screen, the identity of that user is very easy to find out the identity of that person.


This idea is wrong, the persons, who survey the Internet, would profile those persons by using the Data profiling, and if the account is used only in the public networks, that person might have something to hide. In the real situation, the surveillance team just sends the little cookie with some downloadable package, and this cookie would install the small program in that computer. That program would tell that some computer uses the Net when this computer would be connected to the Internet next time. And if that happens in the home, would the connection tell, who uses this computer, because the flat or house can be tracked by using normal tracking protocol.


 But the case would be more complicated if the hotspot will be installed to some flat without telling that thing to the person, who lives in that apartment, and this WLAN-station can be hidden behind some furniture or inside some walls. The hackers can use that hotspot for dirty things. The data security is the race between hackers and security. In some cases could the security team get the information about the computers serial numbers, and they can track the owner of that computer by using payment- or guaranteed data, what tells, who have bought this computer and guarantee services for it.


So this means that there is no change to hide the identity in the world of the Internet. In some cases, the antivirus software, what is loaded from the wrong net site would contain the feature, that it would remove all viruses, but those Trojan horses will send every single package of that data to the hackers, who might work in private corporations or under the government surveillance.