Can private corporations offer a chance to respond? To the new challenges in space?

 

“SpaceX launched the NROL-179 mission for the U.S. government early Friday morning (June 19) from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. (Image credit: SpaceX) (Space.com, SpaceX launches new batch of US spy satellites from California (video))

SpaceX  launched NRO recon satellites from Vandenberg. Details of those satellites are classified. But because NRO operates reconnaissance satellites. Those satellites’ mission is  connected to intelligence operations. This means that the U.S. strengthens its spaceborne abilities. 

But that launch itself. It causes discussions. About the role of Elon Musk and the SpaceX corporation in governmental operations. Those satellites play a vital role in space-based targeting and other types of missions. And they offer the ability. To see things that are hidden from other actors. The space gives SpaceX the possibility to rule those areas. And people are concerned about the strength. Of the SpaceX corporation. 

NASA attempts to save the SWIFT telescope. It can also have dimensions. That we ever imagined. The Katalyst corporation is the actor behind the satellite. That should do the mission. 

The same rockets that can transport things.Like satellites to space. They can also be used to carry killer satellites. NASA plans to launch. A miniature satellite that takes the Swift telescope by using manipulators. The satellite can push the SWIFT telescope into the right trajectory.  By using the hydraulic piston. The satellite can also use manipulators to throw the telescope. Or a miniature satellite. It can be used as a space tug. That pulls the damaged telescope to the right trajectory. The satellite that should do that mission is made  by the Katalyst corporation. 

And the knowledge of the satellites' trajectories is the thing. That allows them to affect them. And we know that the same system. That can push  space telescopes. Into another trajectory. That system can also throw other satellites into the atmosphere. This makes the attempt to rescue the space telescope by using another satellite. That will be launched by using the Pegasus rocket. The Pegasus is an airborne-launched system. That rocket. It can transport a small satellite to the orbiter. And the satellite. It can use similar systems. These are used in the case of the Swift telescope. For pushing the targeted satellite back into the atmosphere. And those kinds of systems. 

The mission profile for that service flight. For the rescue SWIFT telescope. 

They can be used to find and affect killer satellites. Or. So-called sleeping FOBS (fractional orbital bombardment system) satellites. Those spaceborne nukes. They  can be used for surprise attacks. The FOBS satellite. It can be used as a nuclear-based EMP(electromagnetic pulse) system. In simulations. The EMP impulses can be used to prepare the opponent for a nuclear strike. The idea in those systems is that a high-power nuclear explosion at high altitude paralyzes electronics before the nuclear mass raid. In 1962, the high altitude nuclear test “Starfish Prime” was conducted above Honolulu. The 1,4 megaton exoatmospheric nuclear explosion caused electronics to be destroyed all around Honolulu. 

Modern electronics are more vulnerable to spaceborne nuclear explosions and their EMP pulses than 1960’s primitive technology. The EMP causes a situation. All communications are shut down. The jetfighters. They cannot rise to defense. And it’s possible that missiles cannot be launched because the EMP destroyed their electronics. Or the transmitters that should transmit launching signals are destroyed. The ability to find those FOBS satellites. It makes it possible to deny the surprise attacks using the sleeping nuclear detonation satellites. There is. The ability to push them into the atmosphere is the thing. That makes them unable to complete their missions. 

The problem with the nuclear-powered EMP is that. The 1,4 megaton hydrogen bomb is not the limit of those weapons. The EMP weapon. It can be much more powerful than the 1,4 megaton bomb. Used in Starfish Prime. The EMP satellites can also form a network all around the world. The large-scale EMP strike can have a destructive effect on fleet and ground-based infrastructure. 

Wikipedia says the Russian killer satellite program is like this: “Nivelir (Russian: "dumpy level"; Project 14K167) is a class of Russian military low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites widely believed to be co-orbital anti-satellite weapons (ASAT) with secondary space surveillance missions. The spacecraft are often compared to Matryoshka "nesting dolls". As each contains a smaller inspector subsatellite, which can itself. Deploy one or more kinetic kill vehicles (KKV).” Wikipedia, Nivelir) 

The first of those satellites was launched in 2022. And there is a possibility that the Russians plan to create Earth-orbiting nuclear-armed satellites. Those satellites can drop a nuclear bomb on cities. Or they can detonate their internal warheads in surprise attacks. Detonating those satellites is not very difficult. The system is like a high-tech car bomb. When that satellite is in the right position. The system. It gives a launching code. Then the nuclear warhead detonates. The only problem is that EMP also destroys friendly satellites. 

https://www.nro.gov/Portals/135/Documents/news/Press%20Kits/10463_Press%20Kit%20book_Launch_Pro-Arch179_6.11.26.pdf?ver=0v03xnXSpOK_ni7ywyhemw%3d%3d

https://roboticsandautomationnews.com/2025/10/01/nasa-awards-30-million-to-katalyst-space-technologies-to-rescue-500-million-satellite/95080/

https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/spacex-spy-satellite-launch-nrol-179-nro

https://www.the-sun.com/news/14598954/russian-killer-satellite-us-spacecraft/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Orbital_Bombardment_System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nivelir

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

The flying saucers can be secret rescue and other special purpose military vehicles

Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Avrocar type saucer-shaped aircraft can be manned or they can be remote controlled, and because they might be invisible in the radar, they might use in many secretive missions. Those things would be operating in the missions, where the nuclear weapons must return the base in the case of accidents of strategic nuclear bombers. They would be actually like a differently shaped crane-drones, what are used in the same style missions with those normal helicopter-drones.

The technology, what is used in those "saucers", might be actually very conventional. Some of them might actually be the quadcopters, what is covered with the STEALTH-profile. And maybe if they need speed and power, they might use the similar small size jet engines, what are using in the cruise missiles. Those jet engines can be installed in the saucer that one is giving thrust in the vertical movement, and others would be installed for giving horizontal thrust.

Those motors would be in radial symmetry around the center of the "flying saucer".  This kind of motors can give this aircraft a very good maneuverability, and that can be a very good thing for creating the multimission military aircraft. But if those motors would operate like blowers, could it be possible to load the "flying saucer" with electricity. And if there would be the military aircraft or satellites, what has powerful radio transmitters, could those aircraft load the saucer with electricity, and give it unlimited operating range.

The famous UFO picture, where two military jets are escorted the saucer-shaped object is a very well-known thing in the aviation magazines, and in fact, it might portrait some model of the Avro Avrocar or the famous "Flying saucer" of the Avro aircraft corporation. The object seems very small in comparison with those jets, what are claimed in publications being  EF-111 "Raven", the electronic warfare model of the F-111 "Aardvark" tactical attack plane, and those aircraft seem like pushing the "flying saucer" in the front of them.

The thing, what is going on in that picture, is the power supply test, where those EF-111 aircraft pump electric energy for the smaller "flying saucer". Those saucer-shaped aircraft might be made for returning the things like dropped spy planes from the Russian territory, and even if they are small size, they can probably operate in a group, that means that group of those aircraft can pull the very big object from the ground because they are strong in the group.

Avrocar type saucer-shaped aircraft can be manned or they can be remote controlled, and because they might be invisible in the radar, they might use in many secretive missions. Those things would be operating in the missions, where the nuclear weapons must return the base in the case of accidents of strategic nuclear bombers. They would be actually like a differently shaped crane-drones, what are used in the same style missions with those normal helicopter-drones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_VZ-9_Avrocar

Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/e1/08/bee10810aa10f47459a5e5c838155070.png

Censorship and the rescue for the political career

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many politicians on the Earth, who don't ever make their own speeches. Why they should make them because there are many good writers on the Earth, who would make texts against little payment. And this is the thing, what makes life easy. But the problem with that kind of things is that those politicians don't want their voters to get that information.


They don't want to tell people, that their speeches and texts are made by somebody else. When we are thinking about the things, what many times rescue those politicians, we are facing the thing, that many times politicians say, that they are not experts in some things. And of course, media would support that kind of things, because many journalists or the owners of newspapers have political destination and connections to political movements.


And those persons offer many times their services to political candidates, who want to be parliamentarians. The thing, what those politicians would not remember is, that this makes them only the frontman of the movement. The situation is similar as with musicians, who buy  texts, what are made by another person. They cannot work independently and those persons have always addicted the support of those writers. If those writers would not make their job, the speeches would not be forming.


Of course, that thing addicts politicians, or musicians because that offers an easy way to make things.  But when we are facing the social media, that is very problematic for the politicians. In social media, the comments can be given immediately after some news, and if the politician cannot make texts independently, that would cause the very embarrassing situation, when the politician is giving the speech, and the update for social media comes in the front of the people during the speech. And this makes social media problematic. This situation is similar to the case when some ice-hockey player would update their social media from the ice during the game.


If we are writing something, we can make mistakes. But if we are not doing anything, we cannot make mistakes. This is true, but if somebody makes our texts and writes our speeches and we would portrait them as our own production, would that be a little embarrassing. If some person gives speeches and shares opinions, would people right to believe, that they are those persons own production. Sometimes in politics, the parties have asked people about their opinions about foreigners or some other things, and then the politicians have made their speeches to please the opinions of the biggest group of people, and that thing has guaranteed the votes for that politician.


Of course, politicians might say, that censorship or moderators have removed their texts from the social media. This is the very good point when the next elections are coming. In a long time, ago the newspapers and TV were very good friends for politicians. They would claim that the media did not publish their opinions and this was the very good argument also for many other persons who were working in the public workplaces.

The professors, who didn't make their jobs could claim, that they have sent their texts to newspapers and scientific magazines, but those media were not published in those texts, because the readers were not interested about them. Censorship is the thing, what allows hide behind the back of some faceless authorities, who would want to drive their own benefits on the Internet.

Estonia the ship, what sank 20 years ago.(28 September 1994)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Under the text links to the video, where the Estonian television journalist reads the names of the people, who were rescued from passenger ship Estonia, but later vanished.  There are many explanations about those vanishings and some of them are very interesting, and some of those explanations might hurt some people, who knew those persons. Maybe those persons vanished because they have made something, what wanted to hide. And when we are thinking about the cases, that those vanishings have connections with drug dealers, those things might not have the straight connection with Estonia-ships sinking.


The Estonia ship sank in the Baltic sea 20 years ago, and that accident was really terrible. Some theories claim that some boxes inside that ship were military technology, but there is no evidence about this. The reason for sinking was that the bolt, where the so-called Atlantic gate was connected cut, and the water came in the ship. The reason, why that bolt was broken is the thing, what is the mystery. Was the cutting caused by accident or some kind of sabotage is not actually explained. If the reason for cutting that bolt was some kind of sabotage, would that made because the ship wanted to turn back. But there is no evidence about sabotage.


Maybe the material was weak, or there were errors in the production process, who knows the real reason, why that bolt betrayed and that ship was sinking in the Baltic Sea. Official reports are made by many professionals, and they said that the bolt was cut because those waves were too high, and that material probably didn't stand the stress. There are some theories, that somebody would cut the bolt by using laser or some explosive, but that cannot be proven. If the laser was used for cutting that bolt, there were left no signs for that.


If somebody was stolen the Soviet laser technology, they would need only one piece and the drawings of those weapons for making copies about those, probably portable systems. There are many theories about stolen weapons on that ship, but were they caused the sinking of that ship is the different thing. So this sinking is officially the accident. When we are thinking about those persons, who were on the lists of survivors, but then vanished, we must ask one question. Did they be on that ship at all?


Or did they buy tickets for somebody else, who were rescued, and then killed the real persons, whose tickets that speculative person used? This is the thing, what I don't want to tell another person, but maybe some of those persons were alive when the survivors bought the hospitals. And if they had connections with some drug dealers those bosses of the criminal organization made the decision, that those persons must die, because they could tell something about those men businesses. This can be one explanation for why those persons were marked as survivors, but later they vanished.

List of those people, who rescued, but then vanished in the case of M/S Estonia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHNGojf5p64

FinnTop5 video about the strange things around M/S Estonia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ptatFQFk6I

M/S Estonia in Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Estonia