Thoughts about plagiarism and isolated societies

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This writing tells about plagiarism and also how people behavior changes in isolated societies and behavior sometimes uncover, that somebody have been in jail. Plagiarism is a crime, you see. There are many people in the world, who are caught of plagiarism. The main reason for the making a new search and detection in the work is that the speech of the suspected person is full of paraphrases or phrases, what seems very known for some professors, and the reason, why those things are dangerous, is that in many universities is very strong culture.

And in those cultures are forming unique phrases or paraphrases, what is always repeating in those societies. And the thing, what makes us repeat some words is that those words are involving something positive for the speakers. Have you ever heard the speech of the person, who has used crack in the pipe? The speech would go well until this person faces the world "pipe". After that begins the reaction, what is very usual for drug addicts.

They are starting to repeat simultaneously the word "pipe". This same phenomenon is visible in other cases, like where the drug has been mixed to tea. This thing makes drug addict repeating word "tea". But there is something else in those persons, what causes the check for plagiarism. One thing is that professors notices, that those words are straight from own publications. Or the person seems to be unable to concentrate the work. This causes suspicious, that some works have been plagued from some other persons work.

In the closed societies is strict behavior code. And that means that some phrases, like some guard, can talk about those questions would mean something more in isolated groups. That could mean, that the person has caused problems and those problems would cause the punishments. This kind of things can uncover many secrets of that kind of person. If somebody is in jail very popular by guards, that would mean that this person is very brave.

Those people sometimes dare to yell anything, what they want, because isolated environment makes possible to get immediate protection by guards. And this kind of thing might cause hate against that kind of persons, who feel that prison has been a great experience. That kind of people can thank the guards of the prison before they go to the execution room. Here I'm talking about some cases, what is handled in public media. Sometimes they believe, that they would get mercy because they are so handsome for the guards who are watching them in death row. But this similar thing is happening sometimes in another kind of prisons, and that thing is making those people quite stressing relationships in freedom.

About the Russian money in the Trump's election campaign and the little words of the history of politics of that nation

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is a thing, what people don't seem to understand about the Russian financial support for Donald Trump's election campaign. The primary question about this kind of investigations is, did Trump knew about the support, what came from Russia? Of course, that money came from the private persons, and they didn't come straight from the Kremlin, what makes that money basically legal. But if the money were given by the Kremlin and the purpose was to support the election campaign of Trump, would the uncovering that support near the final of the presidential election made for supporting the opponent? And that's why that money and the gift was given to public knowledge just before voting process. When we are thinking about the investigations, what are made by special prosecutor Mueller, there is one big question about those investigations.



It is "should the president answer the questions, what investigators make when that person is in office? Here we are talking about the thing, what is very big, and it's should the president be over the law, or could that person kick off, if there are some financial problems with the election campaign? And what happens if some foreign government just put money into those bank accounts, what are opened to the presidential election campaigns. After that, we must say, the most attractive thing for some political thrillers would be that some South American drug cartels would give money to some politicians election campaign. In that case, there would be the very interesting problem, because that bank accounts for the election campaign gifts are open, and what if some drug boss just sends money to those accounts?


And then tells that to the whole world. Could that cause the arresting for the president? That kind of things is very interesting because those drug cartels have money and will to influence the policy of the United States of America. And could the president be responsible for the things, what he or she would not even know? And should that person step out from the office, if that kind of support from illegal actors are found in the election campaigns, even if the president would not know about that money? This example is more radical than the support, what came from the Kremlin but it is basically similar to the real-life case, what is investigated by Mueller.


And of course, the interesting thing is, have somebody make that kind of financial support for presidential elections before in history. Here I must remember, that after the First World War Woodrow Wilson was very passive in the foreign policy. In 1915 the German Submarine sank the ship named Lusitania, and in that case, Wilson was not given the declaration of war to Germany even 1000 united states citizens were killed, and the reason for that was, the ship was under the British flag. Of course, declarations of war are given by Senate, but somebody has claimed that Wilson was in the main role that the Senate was not given the declaration of war to Germany. Even in the ship was over four million rifle patrons, the target was the civilian ship. So that incident turned public opinion in the USA for supporting Great Britain and its alliances.


But then after the first World War, the League of Nations were established in 1919, and the mastermind behind this idea was the foreign minister Grey and it was supported by President Wilson. After that, the Senate has not ratified the Versailles peace treatment and the USA stayed outside the League of nations, and then that nation stated the isolation policy, what ended just until Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. The question in those actions was, that did somebody bribed those congressmen or Wilson to make that kind of decision?


The action of Wilson is sometimes translated to confess people, that he supported the League of Nations, but then that thing torpedoed in the Senate because the USA didn't want to join the battles in Europe. And the major question is, what kind of actions were the Wilson or Senate didn't want to take apart? Wilson's actions after Lusitania have caused claiming, that maybe some Germans gave support for that man? But this is only the speculation. If Wilson would send the troops to Europe in 1915, the war could be ended, because Germany would get honorable peace. But those things are only speculations, and we do not know every fact about those happens, what caused that the League of Nations left without teeth, as we might say. 

Cuckoo-effect and the dark side of human personality

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is the thing, what I would write also in the future. Cuckoo is the bird, what kills it stepsiblings. The thing happens because the cuckoo has sensitive point in it's back and when other chicks in the den would touch that point, will the cuckoo push them out from the den. This behavior has given the name for the effect, where one of the siblings kills family members. Sometimes we will face the news, where is told about domestic violence, where one member of the family has killed one or more members of the family, and this is of course very sad. But why somebody makes that thing?


Sometimes there is the tumor in the brain tissue, what causes violent behavior, but sometimes the reason is that this member of the family has been violated in the society. In this kind of cases, one member of the group would face the violation. When we are thinking about the cases, where only one member of the group has been targeted for the very bad domestic violation, we are facing the situation, where one time is too much, and then happens something very bad. But what kind of person violates family member even years?


This kind of things are happening, because the violation and humiliation were accepted by the authorities of that society. The society makes the situation, where the hate can grow inside the mind of that person. In many religious isolated groups have been behavior, that if the patriarchs of the community would be resisted, the punishment would be an assault against that person. In those societies, the patriarch would not use violence by himself.


There is a mark, what other follow, and it could be that the patriarch would turn the back for the person, who was marked for abuse. And then the other members of the group would attack that targeted person. In some families, this mark is the phrase "when daddy comes home". That means that some person would get the punishment. And then the mother of the family would leave the belt to the chair, what means she asks punishment.


This kind of punishment is a very bad thing because children would stop to fear that violation. They would move to the streets, and that will cause bad things in the society. Sometimes there are people, who have taken part in the assaulting the siblings because their parents ordered that. Or they gave permission to play "adult" for one of the family members. And that is seen in their behavior. They always ask their henchmen giving "open hand" for the children, who call to the workplace or otherwise disturb the workday of adult persons.


For those persons, the adulthood means only right to give punishments. They have always right to order other persons to do anything, that they want, and those men and women would do anything. If they even have to open the door by themselves if there is found some henchmen, that is the great insult for that person and authority of that man or woman. But how somebody become the person, who would always give only punishments, is the question, what is the very interesting thing. One of the answers is normally, that they would face the violence in the younghood, but that is not actually true. Persons who have faced the violation in their childhood normally would not accept the violence against children.


The reason why physical punishment in the home is prohibited is the "Lucifer effect", because if the person would be someday in the same position, what the violator has been, would that cause that this person would act same way against the helpless persons. The effect is caused because somebody has been violated that man or woman, and then when this person has got the same position as the violator has, that would cause the change to revenge the treatment. But this kind of violence is targeted for the elder people, and it happens in old people's home.


In the human mind is the system, what is built for protecting our species, and that is that the form of children normally makes the person act a nonviolent way. And the reason, what causes the "Lucifer-effect" is hate against the persons, who have humiliated that man or woman. And that causes sometimes very traumatic behavior, what would bring sad headlines in the newspapers. When the person knows, that there would become the punishment anyway, does he or she the things, what normal people would not even think to do.


One of the examples in history is when the prisoners of the Treblinka death camp started the rebel and took the weapons from the hands of their guards without thinking about their own safety. The reason was, that those persons knew, that they would die anyway, and that was the reason, why they attacked the guards, and only three of them survived. But this is an example, what desperate persons would get.


The violence against children is something, what we never understand. But sometimes we are looking that thing from the newspaper, and then we must remember, that those persons, who would make the things, what are causing the death for the children have sometimes thought that they have done right things. Somewhere those persons have learned to shake the children if they are noisy. And that could be very dangerous. Domestic violation is the very traumatic thing, what leaves the marks for the victimized person rest of the life. That thing makes more violence in the streets and keeps police in the work.