Tuesday, November 6, 2018

About Oamuamua asteroid and imagination.

Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about financing and making theories, we must remember, that there are really many people, who are making many theories and write something, what is claimed as the thoughts or products of the imagination. Here we are facing the fact, that the persons who are giving money to us, are the persons, whose songs we are singing. This is the thing in the science today.

The thoughts what we publish would be that kind of, that public audience is reading them. When we are thinking about SETI-investigators, I don't believe that those persons are claiming that there is no reason to continuing that program.  When we or I am writing about some humanoid spaceship, what should I write? Should I write only two words and say always "It's a fake" like civilized persons make? Or can I sometimes write something, what I really want to write?

When somebody says that "of course there are no intelligent civilizations at universe", we must ask the reason, why the existence of those civilizations is impossible? And then we are talking about things like Oamuamua, we are always want to read about fundamental theories and the proving of many of those theories is difficult or even impossible.

When some scientists are talking something, or publish something, they don't always remember to write things, what is fully proven in the face of the science. Also, scientists have the right to use imagination about the things, what they see and read, and if the public audience is interesting about the texts, that guarantees the funding about those things. If some scientists are working in SETI-program, I will believe that those persons are trying to defend their work. Their workplace is in those programs, and that's the reason, why those persons are giving that kind of information about some asteroids.

Picture I

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55b265aae4b064ab3a3c2cca/5666e9d30e4c1145da128dce/57db1e68ff7c509103761aab/1473986361385/800px-Parkes_Observatory_-Australia-15Aug2009.jpg?format=1500w

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Superhydrophobic materials can be more fundamental than we think.

"Research on metal-organic frameworks has led to the development of superhydrophobic surfaces by grafting hydrocarbon chains, which cre...