Is there something that people don't want you to know about giants?

I sometimes thought that could some giants made by using eugenics? The Gigantes were in Geek mythology the extremely great size warriors. And maybe in some kingdoms were military units formed by extremely large-size warriors. So if some people want to benefit those military units by creating large-size soldiers that thing is possible. I don't know how much ancient Greeks knew about genetic heredity, but there is the possibility that they knew that tall parents got tall children. 

There is the possibility to create a bloodline where descendants are made by favoring the tall persons. This thing where tall people are favored will create people who are taller than regular humans. So are some giants made by creating the bloodline of the extremely tall people? Who knows, but those kinds of theories are interesting to think about. 

When the president of the Smithsonian institute Powell wrote the paper called "Powell doctrine" is it possible that this kind of paper covered the giants who made it in purpose? In that case, there is the possibility that extraordinary growth can make by using the bloodline, where is used, extraordinary tall people. Or the other way is using the growth hormone. So are some of those giants the results of the genetic experiments? And is Powell doctrine made for prohibiting people to play god? 

That kind of bloodline is the same way easy to create as bloodlines of the racehorses. If people have suitable genetic material like gametes of the wanted horses. Creating the bloodline of good racehorses is easy. In those bloodlines is selected only good runners. And that thing makes it possible to create racehorses that are better runners than others. In the same way, researchers can highlight all wanted features of living organisms. 

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giants_(Greek_mythology)#:~:text=In%20Greek%20and%20Roman%20Mythology%2C%20the%20Giants%2C%20also,%28or%20Gigantomachia%29%2C%20their%20battle%20with%20the%20Olympian%20gods.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_Doctrine

Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giants_(Greek_mythology)#:~:text=In%20Greek%20and%20Roman%20Mythology%2C%20the%20Giants%2C%20also,%28or%20Gigantomachia%29%2C%20their%20battle%20with%20the%20Olympian%20gods.

A couple of mythic tales of identical twins, and I hope that both of them are just myths. 

The use of identical twins as the testing the genetic heritable and learned abilities is difficult. That thing requires that the twins are grown separately, and that thing is very hard to make. But if that kind of case is found. This thing gives good information of the skills which are learned or which are genetically heritable. 

The identical twins are an interesting thing. If we want to make synthetic identical twins, there is the possibility to share the early-stage embryos and then the other of them can transport to another side of Earth. That kind of thing is not allowed, but that kind of sharing the embryos doesn't require very high-level skills. 

Identical twins are close to each other. And that thing causes the very little known theory about the mysterious abductions or the UFO kidnappings. That theory is that one of the purposes of abduction is to steal gametes for the research where researchers are mapping the genetically heritable and learned abilities. 

A couple of creepy thoughts about identical twins. And how to benefit them. Those ideas can be used as topics for some political thrillers. 

The identical twins are connected with Dr. Josef Mengele. And that nazi-doctors interest in those things is causing interesting theories. There is the possibility that Mengele or his superiors planned to benefit identical twins as the servants of the nazi-government. In the simplest model, the twins can play with each other. While another is in secret training the other will occupy the place of the another. 

In this scenario, another twin is making illegal actions like assassinations another twin can be visible.  That thing is possible if the people don't know about another twin.  In some scenarios, identical twins are grown separately. Another twin is grown as nazi and the another will grow as normal people. Then that "nazi-twin" will replace that "normal" twin. That kind of scenario might be a myth.

But the high-ranking SS officials might discuss it in the SS headquarters about this kind of solution for winning the war.  We know that Himmler collected religious artifacts, so why they would not discuss this kind of solution. There is made identical twins who are acting as pairs. Another would be liberal and another is nazi. The liberal pair does not know about that nazi-twin. And then the liberal part will be killed by assassins. And nazi takes the place of that person. 

Then the liberal pats of those pairs will turn to politics and then change to the nazi. That thing happens by murdering the liberal and then losing the body. Then the nazi will take that place. The thing that something was under discussion is not the synonym that something is to be done. The identical twins would be useful in that kind of operation. 

And the more weird theory goes like this: If the human will grow in the same womb as the human that alien will think of the human as brother or sister. That thing will make the gate to the world of aliens. But that idea is pure theory. The thing is that this thing is one of the biggest mysteries in the world is abductions. 

Lorentz's strange attractor. The butterfly-effect can turn the zero-point energy possible.

 

 

 

Lorentz's strange attractor can make pure energy or one version of "zero-point energy possible". If the electricity would travel in the superconducting circuit it can travel there forever, and if the circuit would take energy from outside in the form of radio waves, it can make it possible that the system can get more energy than it delivers.

Lorenz's strange attractor is one of the most interesting things in chaos theory. The strange attractor is the model of the system, where energy will surround endlessly, and if there will come energy from outside, the energy in the strange attractor will grow. So the idea of the system is that the strange attractor would be acting as the generator, which creates energy from the radio fields, and it can transmit it to the normal electric circuit.

Lorentz's strange attractor is the model is the self-sustaining system, where energy travels in a circuit, and the circuit means that when energy is traveling around the form it just transfers to the other circuit. So the energy would travel in the system forever if some turbulence would not break the form. That thing requires that energy is traveling only one direction, and if the system can conduct it nowhere, that means it would travel forever. And the outcoming energy will increase the power of the energy, which travels in the system.

The key element in the chaos theory is that if the butterfly flaps its wings on another side of Earth, that thing causes the hurricane at another side on Earth. The reason for that is that the friction would eat less energy from the system than it gets. If we would be on the liquid planet, where friction is extremely low, and we would blow, we can make the storm, what would ever end.

The requirement for that stable trade winds is that the energy, what that wind will get is higher than the energy that goes to friction. One version of this kind of effect is the whirl, like the "Great Red Spot of Jupiter" where the anticyclone gets more energy than the friction takes. And the reason for the power of that whirl is the gravity of the moons of Jupiter, the internal heat of the planet, and the energy of sunlight, which makes that whirl continue forever.  Or some big object can hit to that point, and destroy the form.

Term attractor means a set of phase spaces into which a dynamic system ends up when time passes and in the vicinity of which it also remains, even if the system is slightly disturbed. And the thing is that also atoms, and subatomic particles are also one version of the systems. The system can be stable or it can be moving.

So if we are thinking the quantum entanglement, and superposition, can this kind of turn to stable in one situation. The system must get the energy from somewhere else, and the case is that if the quantum entanglement and superposition are through the level of dimension.

In that case, the quantum entanglement and superposition can stay "forever", or at least until the existence of the material of the dimensions is ending. The quantum entanglement has caused a theoretical possibility that the energy can be brought from higher dimensions to our dimension by using the superpositioned particles.

The Lorentz's strange attractor or Lorentz's butterfly is also the form of the particle, or twin particle system, which can be in two spaces (or quantum spaces) at the same time. Lorentz's strange attractor is the thing that could symbolize quantum entanglement, the condition where two particles have opposite spin, and that thing is one of the most interesting visions of the quantum systems. '
'
But if the system can be in two spaces or quantum spaces at the same time, could those particles be in two dimensions at the same time? So if the particles are in a superposition, and they are also quantum entanglement, could that mean that the other part of this superposition particle pairs can be in the upper dimension and one is at the lower dimension?

In this case, the strange attractor would connect the dimensions. But the Lorentz's strange attractor is one of the most interesting models of artificial intelligence. There two supercomputers (or quantum computers) that can make data flow through the same hub, and that would make the system create the own models. The idea is that when data is traveling through the hub, the hub would send the action to the actor. Then the system would analyze the action and make the additions or deletions required to streamline operations.


https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jupiter-s-great-red-spot-likely-a-massive-heat-source

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attractor#Strange_attractor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Red_Spot

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

What would we ask artificial intelligence, what runs on a quantum computer?

   

What would we ask artificial intelligence, what runs on a quantum computer?

As you might know, there is a 50% possibility that reality is a simulation. That means that we are living in a computer simulation if this theory is true. But what we would be if that theory is true? Are we some kind of computer programs or are we some kind of creatures that are laying in some kind of tank, and our nervous system would be connected to the computer and virtual reality?

The simulated reality theory is the actually philosophical dilemma about things like could the computer program got feelings? Or rather asking: could artificial intelligence programs sense the environment like a living organism? Or could there someday be possible to make artificial intelligence, what has the same intelligence level, what human has?

If we are thinking about the complicated artificial intelligence-solutions that are running on the quantum computer, there is the possibility that the computer can solve mathematical problems and make the solutions for logical problems, but the question is does this kind of system emotional feelings? The fact is as I have written earlier that artificial intelligence can emulate feelings or emotions.

But that's it. It doesn't have real feelings at all. The computer just acts the feelings, but it cannot feel things. So we cannot hurt the emotions of artificial intelligence, but if we are saying something that is normally hurting, the artificial intelligence can say "you hurt me".

The fact in artificial intelligence and machine learning is that there is a possibility that the thing forms the Boltzmann Brain. Self or independently awaken awareness. But what the awareness mean? The awareness means that the system would defend itself unexpectedly. Or the system would do somethings that are not predicted. But the awareness of the system might be something that we can call virtual awareness.

In some interesting ideas or scenarios, very complicated artificial intelligence would turn aware when it collects data from the internet. The computer would know how to act in a certain social situation. It would find the module from the database that involves answers to certain questions like "how tall is the tallest mountain on Earth?

The system would take that data from its database or form the query on the Internet by asking the tallest mountain on earth. And then search the elevation and then the number that is behind that word. But does the computer really understand, what that number means? This thing is also called pseudo intelligence. The system can form complicated chains of words and the grammar checker would make sure that those sentences are looking good.

And then the computer can collect those questions in the database. If the same person repeats a question very soon or it is repeated in the same space within the same group, the computer can say "I just answer". And the detection the people the computer can use image scanners, voice compile systems, and navigation system that tells what room the robot is?

Or what would you think, if the user asks the artificial intelligence that is turned to Boltzmann Brain the question "are you aware"? The computer would answer the question "yeas I'm aware". Or then the computer might ask, "how do you describe awareness? ". The answer to that thing is one of the most difficult things in the world.

The computer itself cannot estimate is it aware or not. The thing that the observer notices does the computer defend itself or not. When the observer will cut the electricity off, the computer might say "would you please leave power on"? But that thing can also connect with the power switch, and that means that the computer actually plays tape to the user. The same way a person can say some words of China without understanding the mean of those words.

http://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/11/what-if-we-could-ask-artificial-intelligence-what-runs-on-a-quantum-computer/

The wormhole theory and the explanation for the form of wormholes

    

The wormhole theory and the explanation for the form of wormholes

Can we someday travel through wormholes? Maybe not, but there is a possibility we can send an unmanned miniature probe through it or use it as the camera obscura. In that case, the wormhole would be acting like optic fiber, which brings light through it, and that light can use to make it possible to make observations from the distant areas in the universe.

The natural explanation for things like dark matter is that the lost matter or dark energy would be the energy stored in the wormholes, and the thing that is ripping the universe into pieces would be the oscillation of the wormholes. So does that feel like some kind of strange vision? The existence of wormholes doesn't mean that it can use in travel. There is the possibility that only energy can travel through that energy tunnel. There are lots of articles about wormholes and you might look at them by Googling the words wormhole theory. In this case, I must remember that wormhole is a theory.

Traveling through the wormhole is one of the most interesting visions in the world. But how that thing happens? There is a possibility that the living organism cannot travel through that thing or only energy can travel through the Einstein-Rose bridge or energy tunnel. In that case, we could try to use the wormhole for making observations from the distant areas of the universe.

The question is how the particle could travel through the wormhole that the time would not run in it. So two possibilities make that travel possible, but the size of the object what can make it would be open.

The virtual wormhole

The first possibility is that the wormhole is a radiation ray. In that case, the energy that comes out from the black hole would cause increasing the energy level in the particle, that the mass of it would rise. And along with the mass and speed, the time would stop in the particle. So if we think that way, things like X-ray bursts are virtual wormholes. The traveling would happen with the speed of light, and the time dilation causes that the time would stop in the particle.

In this case, the object or particle travels maximum with the speed of the light and the journey to Alpha Centauri would take 4 years if the observer would stand outside the object. But the time would stop in the object. But what if we would raise the speed of the object to the speed of the light. And then start to increase its mass? Would that cause the situation that the time moves backward?

So if we want that time would travel backward in that particle we must increase the mass of the object by pumping it with energy that the escaping velocity is about 80% of the speed of the light. And then increase the speed of the object to the level of 60-70% of the speed of the light. That combination should guarantee the virtual crossing the cosmic speed limit. But the need for energy is huge.

Real wormholes (Could the form of wormholes be the connected event horizons of the black holes?)

The idea of the wormhole bases the thing, that a supermassive object like a black hole would drop out from the dimension. The idea of the wormhole is that when a particle drops in a black hole where the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light the energy level of that object would increase so high, that they are also dropping out from the dimension or black hole. So the wormholes would be the connected singularities of the black holes that are oscillating with the same frequency.

The real wormhole would be the bridge of radiation, what travels through the universe. The thing is that this energy bridge would press the object, and then the radiation in it would make the time stopped. But the flow of the particles or electromagnetic radiation causes that the object would travel between distances in seconds.

The electromagnetic bridges would need a black hole for forming. The fact is that the gravity inside those bridges would be extremely high, and the fact is that the radiation would be devastating. If two black holes are pulling the material inside it, and the particles would impact the wormhole, that thing causes the most powerful fusion in the universe. And in that case, traveling through a wormhole would be impossible.

Image: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/black-hole-circling-wormhole-weird-gravitational-waves

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/11/the-wormhole-theory-and-the-explanation-for-the-form-of-wormholes/

The wormholes and cosmic web

The wormholes and cosmic web

At this point, we must realize that there is little difference if the material can travel through the wormhole in the form of electrons or photons than the human can travel through those hypothetical energy channels. Even if we could send the miniature unmanned probe, what size is about a couple of centimetres, that thing is far away from technology, that some astronaut can travel through that energy channel.

The attempt to explain every phenomenon in the universe by using mathematical calculations is doomed to fail. There are many things in the world, that we cannot even see, and one of them is the fourth dimension. We cannot realize or describe it, because we cannot imagine things that we cannot see. We cannot see things in the black hole, because there are no photons, what can escape from that place. The event horizon is the end for observation of material, but we can imagine that there are many layers behind that point, and the gravity would get strengthen behind that point.

Even if escaping velocity reaches the speed of light that doesn't mean that the existence of material doesn't end. The material exists behind the event horizon, and then it would continue to drop in the mass center as it does on Earth or some other "normal planet". So the nucleus of the black hole would continue to pull the material to it even if it crosses the line, where escaping velocity is the speed of light.

Is cosmic web or cosmic neural structure caused by wormholes?

Could the Cosmic neural structure prove that wormholes exist? When we are looking at the famous cosmic megastructure, what is called "Cosmic neural structure" where the gas has been packed in the form that looks like some kind of gauze, we might ask, why the gas and dust makes that structure? Does that structure form across the energy channels, what could be the Einstein-Rose bridges? Or is there something else like the X-ray radiation, which causes that some bites of dust are heavier than others?

And then the material should act as it acts in the normal universe. That means that crossing the speed of the light would be possible at least inside the black hole. But can we do that thing outside the black hole and singularity? Maybe there is a wormhole or Einstein-Rose energy bridge or energy channel that takes the material away from the black hole. Who knows the truth. And finding out the truth requires fly in the black hole, and in that case, there is a possibility that our spaceman doesn't return.

The reason could be that the black hole would not create a wormhole because they do not exist or it doesn't oscillate with the same frequency with another black hole, which means there is no energy channel between them. Or the astronaut comes out from the white hole from another universe, and then the return requires the black hole, which would take the astronaut back to our universe. And we have no single observation about white holes.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.525731/full

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image I: https://astronomy.com/news/2019/07/if-wormholes-exist-could-we-really-travel-through-them

Image II: https://www.earthchangesmedia.com/the-cosmic-web-seeing-what-makes-up-the-universe

 https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/11/the-wormholes-and-cosmic-web/

Wave movement and dimensional theories

   

Wave movement and dimensional theories

 

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/10/wave-movement-and-dimensional-theories/

Cognito Ergo Sum II

  

Cognito Ergo Sum II

Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists?

If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human.

When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to be red or breathing badly that robot can go and offer help and use things like Heimlich Maneuver, but the thing is that certain parameters activate the action what the robot makes. Those actions are stored in the database, certain modules that include certain actions. But that doesn't mean that the robot understands what it does.

The fact is that if we are thinking of things like bugs, we must ask are those things real or are they alive. The answer is biologically bugs are alive creatures because they can make descendants and they can defend themselves. If some wasp would sting you, that thing means that the wasp exists, and that experience would be painful. But then we might think robot what would make copies of itself, and defend its operation area. The robot that makes copies of itself could call the "Von Neumann machines".

The fact is that if some car factory, what can make sub-robots that can find the raw materials independently and make copies of itself would also defend its area what makes it less living than some bug? The Von Neumann-machine can make powerful things like copies of itself, but it might not realize what it does. So does wasp understand what it does, when it puts its sting in the human skin? That thing is interesting. The very complicated Von Neumann-machines would be the things, what would revolutionize many things.

Quantum computers are causing the revolution in artificial intelligence. Quantum computers can run more complicated algorithms than we ever imagine. So even the computing capacity would put limits to the operations of artificial intelligence, we must realize that the quantum computers would make things, what computers ever make.

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer?

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer? Here I mean that could we put a person in a controlled dream, where the neural network of brains is operating as a quantum computer.

And that thing causes the discussions, what are the limits of artificial intelligence? Can we someday turn our brains into the quantum computer? In that case, the person would put in the condition, where the consciousness is connected off. Then the person would turn to the quantum computer, what operates by following the electric impulses, what are giving the impulses through the neural tracks.

In that case, the person would put in the "controlled dream", and then the brain would acting like the quantum computer. In some of the wildest ideas or jokes, the abductions are things, that are made, when the humanoids need more calculation capacity in their crafts. The fact is that the neural tracks neural systems that are connected to a computer can act as the quantum computer.

Image II: https://www.artstudio.org/surrealists-melded-reality-with-dreams-ito-create-imaginative-juxtapositions-of-imagery/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/09/cognito-ergo-sum-ii/