Skip to main content

The Black Knight satellite and antimatter



Picture I
http://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/p/the-black-knight-satellite-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes there are many risks about the strange objects like "Black Knight" satellite. And the biggest one is conducting theory, that this object would be made by some super civilization. In this writing, I will seek the possibility that humanoids have visited near the Earth and left the satellite behind them for observing the Earth, in the point of view, that this hypothesis would be possible.



When we are thinking about the fact of the "Black Knight" satellite, that could be the result of some early test of the launching the satellite orbiting the Earth. Maybe that satellite was sent to the orbital for testing the capacity to send the public satellite. Officially the "Explorer I" was the first satellite, what was sent to orbital, but there were claiming, that there were shot other satellites in the same day because nobody wanted to fail the first satellite, what the USA send to the orbiter in 1958. Maybe "Black Knight" is some "Vanguard"-satellite, what was sent secretly for spying Soviet radar signal. And of course, that was not told to the public audience. That "Black Knight"  satellite would also be sent by the Soviets but this is only theory. Maybe they want that Sputnik I would be number one because this "Black Knight" could look like too aggressive for demonstrating the know-how of the Soviet Union.




The super civilization might deny the stealing of their intelligence satellites or probes in a very radical way. Those hypothetical aliens could change the materials of their probe as the antimatter, that denies effectively capturing that probe. If that probe would be made antimatter, that would effectively deny all attempts to investigate those devices. Actually, we could make that process on Earth, but the mass of the antimatter would be so high, that the explosion would be the size of the supernova. Antimatter is the mirror of the normal material, but the anti-proton has negative electricity and positron or anti-electron has positive electricity. And anti-neutron rotates to opposite direction to the normal neutron. Because we can produce anti-helium, we can produce any other anti-elements of material, like anti-iron.


But the production of the large mass of antimatter is very expensive and that thing is very dangerous. The storing of antimatter would happen in the magnetic bottle, where the magnets pull the antimatter away from the layers. In this bottle, antimatter would float in the empty space, but if the magnet would be lost electricity, the antimatter would touch the bottle and the explosion would be extremely powerful. The antimatter bomb would be actually the magnetic bottle what would drop to the enemy positions, and then the ventilate of this bottle will open, and the air would touch antimatter.


We are making antimatter on the Earth very small masses, and that means that in the laboratories like CERN would be produced the only couple of atoms of antimatter in the year, for the collation tests, where the positron or anti-electron would collide with the electron. The antimatter is very dangerous because all the mass of the matter would transfer to energy if the anti-particle will contact the particle. The releasing energy level is so high, that the gram of antimatter would destroy entire Earth.


The CERN's cyclotron particle accelerator could cause very much damages in another way. It's enough that the little piece of metal like steel haul would be sent to an accelerator with the maximum energy, and then the electricity of the magnets just cut off. The impact energy to the wall of accelerator would be extremely high. And that could cause the destruction in the large areas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorer_1


Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/58/13/e8/5813e8d966609858d22404830a7d8552.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The new 3D printers are coin-size systems.

"The tiny device could enable a user to rapidly create customized, low-cost objects on the go, like a fastener to repair a wobbly bicycle wheel or a component for a critical medical operation. Credit: Sampson Wilcox, RLE" (Scitech, Tiny Titan: MIT’s Revolutionary Coin-Sized 3D Printer Fits in Your Pocket) Researchers created a 3D printer that is coin-size. That kind of printer can create things like microchips. But it's possible. Those tiny 3D printers can also work in extremely large-size projects. In simplest models, the 3D printers are positioned on tracks. The 3D printer itself is the tool, that can be part of the modular production systems.  There are visions of high-temperature metal printers installed on the gantry cranes. That makes those crane printers that can make even ship-size things. The crane that the printer controls can move back and forth and the printer can move horizontally. This kind of thing can turn the crane into a high-temperature 3D printer, that

Quantum computers and ultra-fast photonic microchips can danger even the most secure communication.

"Quantum computers could pose a major security risk to current communication systems in 12-15 years with their exponentially greater speed and code-breaking ability. (ScitechDaily, Today’s Most-Secure Communications Threatened by Future Quantum Computers) Quantum computers can break entire binary cryptography. And that makes all communication unsecured. That is one of the greatest threats in quantum computing. And this brings the arms race to the quantum age. The quantum computer can create codes that any binary computer can break. But the quantum computer can also break old-fashioned codes. And that makes it an ultimate weapon and sabotage tool.   Quantum computers can change the measurements of the ammunition in factories by changing the system calibration. Or it can delete databases from the opponent's computer systems. This thing can delete all SIM cards from mobile telephones. In peacetime, the hackers that operate using quantum systems can steal the names of the counter-

Electric power innovations. Fuel cells in aircraft and solar panels over Arizona canal.

  "ZEROe teams powered on the iron pod, the future hydrogen-propulsion system designed for Airbus’ electric concept aircraft." (Intersting Engineering, Airbus's ZEROe: First engine fuel cell powers up for hydrogen flight) Electric power innovations. Fuel cells in aircraft and solar panels over Arizona canal.  Airbus Zero is a testbed for fuel cells that are used in commercial aircraft. The problem with aircraft is always noise and pollution. If the aircraft uses electric engines. That decreases noise levels and cleans the air, especially around airfields. Lightweight solar panels that can be installed on the wings and body of aircraft can give electricity to electric engines. And they can extend an aircraft's operational range.   The thing that makes this kind of system interesting is that the "flying cars" or cheap VTOL aircraft can use them as a power source. The hydrogen power cells can give energy to electric aircraft at night time. And that makes them m